Nikon’s 8x32 HGs were one of my favourite binoculars. In this review I look
at what makes them a bit special, even today.
Nikon 8x32 HG (Venturer LX) Review
When Nikon’s High Grade (HG) range came out, they
caused quite a stir. Why? Because many reviewers noticed the unfortunate truth
that between these and their SE porro prism range,
Nikon now produced the best birding binoculars in the world. Imagine Lexus producing
a car to beat BMW, Mercedes and Porsche and you get the idea.
More than a decade later, the European ‘Alpha’
manufacturers have caught up and then some, but the HGs still remain a
wonderful binocular, still the very best in some areas.
At A Glance
|
Magnification |
8X |
|
Objective Size |
32mm |
|
Eye Relief |
17mm |
|
Actual Field of View |
7.8 degrees |
|
Apparent field of view |
57.2 degrees |
|
Close focus |
2.5m |
|
Transmissivity |
~90% |
|
Length |
129mm |
|
Weight |
~800g (695g for the newer HGL version) |
Data from Nikon
What’s in the Box?
Design and Build
Nikon’s HGs were their first attempt to muscle in on the
premium territory of the big three “Alpha” manufacturers. They must have thrown
a lot of R&D at these binoculars because for many years they were way ahead
of any other roofs optically and mechanically.
The pair reviewed here are the older HG model, as opposed to
the (still current as of 2016) HGL. The differences seem to amount to 100g less
weight and eco-glass for the newer model.
The HG(L) line consists of 20mm, 32mm and 42mm sizes in 8x
and 10x magnifications. All were once amongst the most expensive binoculars at
list price, but can typically be had with deep discounts.
Body and Ergonomics
Build quality is outstandingly good. In terms of
appearance these are not as elegant as Leica’s Ultravids,
but build quality is every bit as good, maybe better. If anything, they seem
over-engineered with thick armour and I’d expect them to be very robust. They
are of course fully waterproof.
The body is heavily sculpted, a shape which some
dislike but I find absolutely perfect.
These 32mm HGs and the identical-looking HGLs are
a reasonably compact binocular, but very heavy for their size (the 42mm models
weigh little more and are much more competitive). The 8x32 HG model reviewed
here weighs almost 800g; the new version is lighter at 695g. In either case,
that’s 100-150g more than the Leica or Zeiss equivalents.
You might ask why these are heavier than
competing models from Germany. Is it just lack of sophistication on Nikon’s
part? I don’t think so. What’s going on then?
For one thing, the bigger models have a magnesium
body, but I think these use aluminium. The Leica 32mm models also use
magnesium, whilst the FLs have a composite construction to keep weight down. But
I reckon it’s mostly those oversized eyepieces, which the 32mm models appear to
share with their bigger siblings.
Heavily
sculpted body is comfortable to hold.
Focuser
Probably
the most amazing thing about these binoculars, though, is the focuser. The
focusing is just so smooth, fast (less than a turn from close focus to
infinity) and precise that it feels completely intuitive after a while. Fifteen
years after they were introduced, I still haven’t experienced a better focuser.
The focuser
may not be a greaseless design, but Nikon still claim these binoculars can be
used down to -20 Centigrade.
The dioptre
adjustment works well too, with a ring around the right eyepiece that you lift and
twist to adjust. It is both intuitive and fool-proof.
Optics - Prisms
These are a
conventional Schmidt-Pechan roof prism design. Unlike
many modern roofs, they use silvering, not multi-layer dielectric coatings for
the mirrors. Which is best? This argument has been going on for years in regard
to diagonals for astro’ telescopes and the consensus
seems to be that dielectric are brighter but cause more scatter and so maybe a
loss of resolution. These are both a bright (maximum transmission has been
measured at 90%+ like the best roofs) and a high-resolution binocular, so who
knows?
Optics - Objectives
The
objectives appear to be a triplet or quadruplet design. They are deeply
recessed and fronted by micro-ridge baffles to help cut stray light.
Coatings are
dark, but have a green hue, whereas the latest tend to be pinkish to give
better transmission in the green.
Optics - Eyepieces
The slightly odd appearance of these binoculars
is due to the very large eyepieces. These are doubtless necessary to get the
combination of a wide (7.8 degree) flat field and excellent eye relief (17mm
claimed, but feels more like 20mm) that still elude almost all other small
binoculars (except perhaps for the Swarovski 8x32 ELs).
Eye relief is sufficient to allow me to see the
whole field comfortably with chunky specs on, one of the few binoculars of any
size for which that is true (regardless of the inflated figures often quoted in
brochures). High eye relief can sometimes mean blackouts as you move your eye
around, but not with these.
Make no mistake, this combination of a wide, flat
field with high eye relief is a major achievement in a 32mm binocular. The
reason is that, given the short focal length of the objectives, the eyepieces
will need to have a very short focal length as well (perhaps 12-15mm), something
that makes all those attributes much harder for the optical designer to
achieve.
Unlike Nikon’s SEs these have excellent twist-up
eye cups.
Nikon’s HGs
have bigger, heavier eyepieces than the competition, allowing them more eye
relief and a flatter field.
Accessories
In contrast to the rather low-rent cordura or plain nylon cases you get for your Zeiss, Leica
or Swarovski, the HGs come with a quality leather case, just like the SEs’.
More recent models have an even nicer leather case.
The caps are conventional and the strap is the usual Nikon
product.
These HGs
come with a quality leather case; the HGLs’ is even nicer.
In Use – Daytime
Ergonomics and Handling
The sculpted shape makes for supreme holding
comfort for me, but I do have smallish hands. The armour is very comfortable
and warm with a nicer, less rubbery feel (and smell!) than some premium stuff.
The super-smooth, super-quick focusing makes the
Nikon HGs a fantastic birding binocular. Even birds on the wing can instantly be
snapped into focus.
The eye relief is all that I need and the
twist-up eyecups make them easy to share with a non-glasses wearer, such as my
wife. Did I mention the amazingly quick and accurate focusing?
The only downside is of course the weight and
it’s a major problem for me. At 800g these are just too heavy for me to go on
long hikes with – they become a pain in the neck, literally.
The View
With a brilliant, flat field and a picture-window
wide and bright view, these binoculars almost disappear in-use, the first to
ever give me that experience. Contrast and detail are simply stunning. Perfect
focus is an obvious snap, no hunting around is required – they remind me of a
premier APO refractor in this respect.
Depth of field isn’t the very best, but with such
effortless focusing that hardly matters.
Flat field?
These have an almost perfectly flat field.
Chromatic Aberration
Chromatic aberration is modest, but still present:
a noticeable yellow fringe around very high contrast objects. False colour worsens off-axis and is the one area
these really lag behind a modern HD design.
In Use – Dusk
With
high-transmission optics these perform well at dusk, as well as any binocular
of this size that I’ve tried.
In Use – The Night Sky
These 8x32s are great for birding, but
convention says that you need more aperture for astronomy, right? Wrong. The
Nikon’s bright, wide field, fantastic contrast and accurate, sharp focus make
them superb for astronomy as well. Stars are brilliant pinpoints with lovely
colour and the Orion nebula shows up as well as in any small binocular. Other
small (less than 40mm) binoculars seem dim and lifeless compared to these.
The perfect balance and comfort reduce
shaking, which also makes them easier to use for astronomy than their small
size might lead you to expect. Ideally you would want 10x42s or larger for
astronomy, but if you want a compact birding binocular which will work for
astronomy as well, these are worth considering.
Nikon 8x32 HG vs
Zeiss Victory 8x32 FL
I
replaced the HGs with a pair of Zeiss Victory 8x32 FLs. Here is a summary of
their relative merits.
·
The Zeiss Victorys
are much lighter and slightly more compact.
·
They both have a wonderful view; I
always felt the Nikon’s slightly more immersive, but I can’t quantify that.
·
The Victorys
have a wider field, but it drops off a lot more at the edge.
·
The Victorys
have lower levels of false colour due to their high-fluoride lenses.
·
The Nikons have a palpably superior
external build quality.
·
The Nikons have more eye relief that
makes them more comfortable for specs wearers.
·
The Nikons’ focuser is even smoother
than the Victory’s, but may not be greaseless (so might get stiff in very cold conditions).
·
Street price for the Zeiss Victorys is about double at the time of writing.
The
main advantage of the Victorys is their size and
weight, which really matter in this market segment. They have much lower false
colour, too.
Summary
I’m still not sure I have ever
found a pair of binoculars with a view I like quite as much as these 8x32 HGs’ and
I’m not sure why. I sold my Zeiss BGATs because the view through these was so
much better and when I eventually replaced the HGs with a pair of Zeiss Victory
8x32s, I never liked the Victorys’ view quite as much.
I definitely preferred Nikon’s HGs to their SEs, though everyone told me I
shouldn’t.
So you can take it from me it’s a wonderful view and the
focuser is supreme too. Build quality is as good as it gets. The only downsides
with these binoculars are weight and a bit too much chromatic aberration. But
blame the weight on those eyepieces which give these a big-binocular view: you
can’t have it all, especially in a 32mm binocular.
These get my highest recommendation for everything but their
weight and their worse-than-HD levels of false colour.